Carl’s Coal Mining operates in a remote area. Because of its location, it has monopsony power in the local labor market for miners. Its marginal revenue product of labor is \[MRP_L = 400-5L\] where \(L\) is the total number of miners. The labor supply curve of local miners is \[w = 5L-50\] where \(w\) is the wage (in $1000’s per miner).
If we know the (inverse) labor supply function (which we are given), we can simply double the slope to find the marginal cost of labor:
\[MC(L)=10L-50\]
The optimal quantity of labor to hire for a firm is where its marginal revenue product is equal to the marginal cost of labor:
\[\begin{aligned} MRP_L&=MC(L)\\ 400-5L&=10L-50\\ 400&=15L-50\\ 450&=15L\\ 30&=L^*\\ \end{aligned}\]
The firm has monopsony power, so it faces the entire market supply of labor. For \(L^*\) number of workers, it can pay the lowest wages workers are willing to accept for that quantity, i.e. the labor supply function.
\[\begin{aligned} w&=5L-50\\ w&=5(30)-50\\ w^*&=100\\ \end{aligned}\]
If this was a competitive labor market, with no monopsony power, the firm would be a price-taker of labor, i.e. the supply of labor it faces would be perfectly elastic at the market-determined wage. It would set its marginal revenue product equal to the market wage and hire the quantity of workers for which those values are equal.
\[\begin{aligned} MRP_L &= w\\ 400-5L &= 5L-50\\ 400&=10L-50\\ 450&=10L\\ 45&=L_c\\ \end{aligned}\]
Plug this quantity into the (inverse) labor supply function to the find the market wage:
\[\begin{aligned} w&=5L-50\\ w&=5(45)-50\\ w&=225-50\\ w_C&=175\\ \end{aligned}\]