Carl’s Coal Mining operates in a remote area. Because of its location, it has monopsony power in the local labor market for miners. Its marginal revenue product of labor is MRPL=400−5L where L is the total number of miners. The labor supply curve of local miners is w=5L−50 where w is the wage (in $1000’s per miner).
If we know the (inverse) labor supply function (which we are given), we can simply double the slope to find the marginal cost of labor:
MC(L)=10L−50
The optimal quantity of labor to hire for a firm is where its marginal revenue product is equal to the marginal cost of labor:
MRPL=MC(L)400−5L=10L−50400=15L−50450=15L30=L∗
The firm has monopsony power, so it faces the entire market supply of labor. For L∗ number of workers, it can pay the lowest wages workers are willing to accept for that quantity, i.e. the labor supply function.
w=5L−50w=5(30)−50w∗=100
If this was a competitive labor market, with no monopsony power, the firm would be a price-taker of labor, i.e. the supply of labor it faces would be perfectly elastic at the market-determined wage. It would set its marginal revenue product equal to the market wage and hire the quantity of workers for which those values are equal.
MRPL=w400−5L=5L−50400=10L−50450=10L45=Lc
Plug this quantity into the (inverse) labor supply function to the find the market wage:
w=5L−50w=5(45)−50w=225−50wC=175