Suppose Firm 1 and Firm 2 have a constant MC=AC=8. The market (inverse) demand curve is given by:
P=200−2QQ=q1+q2
Break demand apart into both firms’ output.
P=200−2QP=200−2(q1+q2)P=200−2q1−2q2
Solving for Firm 1, recalling that MR is twice the slope of the inverse demand curve: MR1=200−4q1−2q2
Firm 1 maximizes profit at q∗ where MR=MC:
MR1=MCProfit-max condition200−4q1−2q2=8Plugging in192−4q1−2q2=0Subtracting 8 from both sides192−2q2=4q1Adding 4q1 to both sides48−0.5q1=q∗1Dividing both sides by 4
Since Firm 2 is identical, its q∗ is: q∗2=48−0.5q1
Find Nash equilibrium algebraically by plugging in one firm’s reaction curve into the other’s
q1=48−0.5q2Firm 1's reaction functionq1=48−0.5(\textcolorblue48−0.5q1)Plugging in Firm 2's reaction functionq1=48−24+0.25q1Distributing the −0.5q1=24+0.25q1Subtracting0.75q1=24Subtracting 0.25q1 to both sidesq1=32Dividing by 0.75
Symmetrically, q2=32
Both firms produce 32:
P=200−2(32)−2(32)P=$72
We can find the profit for each firm:
π1=q1(P−c)π1=32(72−8)π1=$2,048
Suppose now both firms collude and act like a single monopolist, who sets:
MR=MCProfit-max condition200−4Q=8Plugging in192−4Q=0Subtracting 8 from both sides192=4QAdding 4Q to both sides48=QDividing both sides by 4
So each firm will produce 24.
The monopoly price will then be P=200−2QP=200−2(48)P=$104
Total profit will then be: Π=Q(P−c)Π=48(104−8)Π=$4,608
with $2,304 going to each firm.
We know the Bertrand-Nash equilibrium is the perfectly competitive one, i.e. where p=MC.
P=MC200−2Q=8192−2Q=0192=2Q96=Q
Each firm produces 48.
The price should be marginal cost, and profits should be zero, but we can confirm:
P=200−2QP=200−2(96)P=$8
Total profit will then be: Π=Q(P−c)Π=96(8−8)Π=$0
Comparing the different equilibria: