Return to the example from lessons 2.2 and 2.3: Firm 1 and Firm 2 have a constant MC=AC=8. The market (inverse) demand curve is given by:
P=200−2QQ=q1+q2
q⋆1=48−0.5∗q2q⋆2=48−0.5∗q1
Substitute follower’s reaction function into market (inverse) demand function
P=200−2q1−2q2The inverse market demand
functionP=200−2q1−2(48−0.5q1)Plugging in Firm
2's reaction function forq2P=200−2q1−96+1q1Multiplying by −3P=104−q1Simplifying the right
MR1=104−2q1
MR=MCProfit-max condition104−2q1=8Plugging in104=8+2q1Adding 2q1 to both
sides96=2q1Subtracting 20 from both sides48=q∗1Dividing both sides by 2
Firm 2 will respond:
q∗2=48−0.5q1q∗2=48−0.5(48)q∗2=48−24q∗2=24
With q∗1=48 and q∗2=24, this sets a market price of
P=200−2QP=200−2(72)P=56
Profit for Firm 1 is
π1=q1(P−c)π1=48(56−8)π1=$2,304
Profit for Firm 2 is
π2=q2(P−c)π2=24(56−8)π2=$1,152
Compared to the Cournot equilibrium where each firm produces 32, setting a market price of $72, and a profit of $2048 for each firm, under Stackelberg competition, Firm 1 produces more than Cournot and earns higher than Cournot profits, while Firm 2 produces less than Cournot and earns less profit.