Firm is a mere production process:
Synonymous with production function
Fully replicable
We'll explore (and explode) this much later
We'll assume “the firm” is the agent to model:
So what do firms do?
How would we set up an optimization model:
Choose: < some alternative >
In order to maximize: < some objective >
Subject to: < some constraints >
Firms convert some goods to other goods:
Inputs: x1,x2,⋯,xn
Firms convert some goods to other goods:
Inputs: x1,x2,⋯,xn
Output: q
The production function
The production algorithm
q=Af(t,l,k)
Factor | Owned By | Earns |
---|---|---|
Land (t) | Landowners | Rent |
Labor (l) | Laborers | Wages |
Capital (k) | Capitalists | Interest |
q=f(l,k)
Factor | Owned By | Earns |
---|---|---|
Labor (l) | Laborers | Wages |
Capital (k) | Capitalists | Interest |
We assume firms maximize profit (π)
Not true for all firms
Even profit-seeking firms may also want to maximize additional things
In economics, profit is simply benefits minus (opportunity) costs
Suppose firm sells output q at price p
In economics, profit is simply benefits minus (opportunity) costs
Suppose firm sells output q at price p
It can buy each input xi at an associated price pi, i.e.
In economics, profit is simply benefits minus (opportunity) costs
Suppose firm sells output q at price p
It can buy each input xi at an associated price pi, i.e.
The profit of selling q units and using inputs l,k is:
π=pqrevenues−(wl+rk)costs
π=pqrevenues−(wl+rk)costs
π=pqrevenues−(wl+rk)costs
Profits are the residual value leftover after paying all factors
Profits are income for the residual claimant(s) of the production process (i.e. owner(s) of a firm):
π=pqrevenues−(wl+rk)costs
Residual claimants have incentives to maximize firm's profits, as this maximizes their own income
Entrepreneurs and shareholders are the only participants in production that are not guaranteed an income!
In markets, production must face the profit test:
Profits are an indication that value is being created for society
Losses are an indication that value is being destroyed for society
Survival in markets requires firms continually create value & earn profits
Choose: < some alternative >
In order to maximize: < profits >
Subject to: < technology >
What do firms choose? (Not an easy answer)
Prices?
Essential question: how competitive is a market? This will influence what firms (can) do
The marginal product of an input is the additional output produced by one more unit of that input (holding all other inputs constant)
Like marginal utility
Similar to marginal utilities, I will give you the marginal product equations
Marginal product of labor (MPl): additional output produced by adding one more unit of labor (holding k constant) MPl=ΔqΔl
MPl is slope of TP at each value of l!
Marginal product of capital (MPk): additional output produced by adding one more unit of capital (holding l constant) MPk=ΔqΔk
MPk is slope of TP at each value of k!
Note we don't consider capital in the short run!
Law of Diminishing Returns: adding more of one factor of production holding all others constant will result in successively lower increases in output
In order to increase output, firm will need to increase all factors!
Law of Diminishing Returns: adding more of one factor of production holding all others constant will result in successively lower increases in output
In order to increase output, firm will need to increase all factors!
Average product of labor (APl): total output per worker APl=ql
A measure of labor productivity
Average product of capital (APk): total output per unit of capital APk=qk
q=f(k,l)
Can build more factories, open more storefronts, rent more space, invest in machines, etc.
So the firm can choose both l and k
This leads to the difference between:
A really difficult concept to think about!
Supply is actually Demand in disguise!
An (opportunity) cost to buy (scarce) inputs for production because other people demand those same inputs to consume or produce other valuable things!
Because resources are scarce, and have rivalrous uses, how do we know we are using resources efficiently??
In functioning markets, the market price measures the opportunity cost of using a resource for an alternative use
Firms not only pay for direct use of a resource, but also indirectly compensate society for “pulling the resource out” of alternate uses in the economy!
Examples:
Opportunity cost is a forward-looking concept
Choices made in the past with non-recoverable costs are called sunk costs
Sunk costs should not enter into future decisions
Many people have difficulty letting go of unchangeable past decisions: sunk cost fallacy
Licensing fees, long-term lease contracts
Specific capital (with no alternative use): uniforms, menus, signs
Research & Development spending
Advertising spending
“Accounting point of view”: are you taking in more cash than you are spending?
“Economic point of view”: is your product you making the best social use of your resources
Implications for society: are consumers best off with you using scarce resources (with alternative uses!) to produce your current product?
Remember: this is an economics course, not a business course!
C(q)=f+VC(q)
C(q)=f+VC(q)
1. Fixed costs, f are costs that do not vary with output
C(q)=f+VC(q)
1. Fixed costs, f are costs that do not vary with output
2. Variable costs, VC(q) are costs that vary with output (notice the variable in them!)
† Assuming that (i) firms are always choosing input combinations that minimize total cost and (ii) input prices are constant. See more in today’s appendix.
Example: Airlines
Fixed costs: the aircraft, regulatory approval
Variable costs: providing one more flight
Example: Car Factory
Fixed costs: the factory, machines in the factory
Variable costs: producing one more car
Example: Starbucks
Fixed costs: the retail space, espresso machines
Variable costs: selling one more cup of coffee
Diff. between fixed vs. sunk costs?
Sunk costs are a type of fixed cost that are not avoidable or recoverable
Many fixed costs can be avoided or changed in the long run
Common fixed, but not sunk, costs:
When deciding to stay in business, fixed costs matter, sunk costs do not!
q | f | VC(q) | C(q) |
---|---|---|---|
0 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
1 | 10 | 2 | 12 |
2 | 10 | 6 | 16 |
3 | 10 | 12 | 22 |
4 | 10 | 20 | 30 |
5 | 10 | 30 | 40 |
6 | 10 | 42 | 52 |
7 | 10 | 56 | 66 |
8 | 10 | 72 | 82 |
9 | 10 | 90 | 100 |
10 | 10 | 110 | 120 |
AFC(q)=fq
AFC(q)=fq
AVC(q)=VC(q)q
AFC(q)=fq
AVC(q)=VC(q)q
AC(q)=C(q)q
MC(q)=ΔC(q)Δq
Calculus: first derivative of the cost function
Marginal cost is the primary cost that matters in making decisions
Mathematical relationship between a marginal & an average value
If marginal < average, then average ↓
Mathematical relationship between a marginal & an average value
If marginal < average, then average ↓
If marginal > average, then average ↑
Mathematical relationship between a marginal & an average value
If marginal < average, then average ↓
If marginal > average, then average ↑
When marginal = average, average is maximized/minimized
Mathematical relationship between a marginal & an average value
If marginal < average, then average ↓
If marginal > average, then average ↑
When marginal = average, average is maximized/minimized
Long run: firm can change all factors of production & vary scale of production
Long run average cost, LRAC(q): cost per unit of output when the firm can change both l and k to make more q
Long run marginal cost, LRMC(q): change in long run total cost as the firm produce an additional unit of q (by changing both l and/or k)
Long run: firm can choose k (factories, locations, etc)
Separate short run average cost (SRAC) curves for each amount of k potentially chosen
Long run: firm can choose k (factories, locations, etc)
Separate short run average cost (SRAC) curves for each amount of k potentially chosen
Long run average cost (LRAC) curve “envelopes” the lowest (optimal) regions of all the SRAC curves!
“Subject to producing the optimal amount of output, choose l and k to minimize cost”
Further important properties about costs based on scale economies of production: change in average costs when output is increased (scaled)
Economies of scale: average costs fall with more output
Diseconomies of scale: average costs rise with more output
Constant economies of scale: average costs don’t change with more output
Minimum Efficient Scale: q with the lowest AC(q)
Economies of Scale: ↑q, ↓AC(q)
Minimum Efficient Scale: q with the lowest AC(q)
Economies of Scale: ↑q, ↓AC(q)
Diseconomies of Scale: ↑q, ↑AC(q)
S(q)=AC(q)MC(q)
We often assume single-product plants/firms, but in reality most firms/plants are multi-product
Economies of Scope: cost of producing multiple products (e.g. q1 and q2) in a single plant exceeds costs of producing a single product in each plant
C(q1,q2)<C(q1,0)+C(0,q2)
Demand for a firm’s product is perfectly elastic at the market price
Where did the supply curve come from? You’ll know today
Average Revenue: revenue per unit of output AR(q)=Rq
Marginal Revenue: change in revenues for each additional unit of output sold: MR(q)=ΔR(q)Δq
Example: A firm sells bushels of wheat in a very competitive market. The current market price is $10/bushel.
Example: A firm sells bushels of wheat in a very competitive market. The current market price is $10/bushel.
For the 1st bushel sold:
What is the total revenue?
What is the average revenue?
Example: A firm sells bushels of wheat in a very competitive market. The current market price is $10/bushel.
For the 1st bushel sold:
What is the total revenue?
What is the average revenue?
For the 2nd bushel sold:
What is the total revenue?
What is the average revenue?
What is the marginal revenue?
q | R(q) |
---|---|
0 | 0 |
1 | 10 |
2 | 20 |
3 | 30 |
4 | 40 |
5 | 50 |
6 | 60 |
7 | 70 |
8 | 80 |
9 | 90 |
10 | 100 |
q | R(q) | AR(q) | MR(q) |
---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | − | − |
1 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
2 | 20 | 10 | 10 |
3 | 30 | 10 | 10 |
4 | 40 | 10 | 10 |
5 | 50 | 10 | 10 |
6 | 60 | 10 | 10 |
7 | 70 | 10 | 10 |
8 | 80 | 10 | 10 |
9 | 90 | 10 | 10 |
10 | 100 | 10 | 10 |
Keyboard shortcuts
↑, ←, Pg Up, k | Go to previous slide |
↓, →, Pg Dn, Space, j | Go to next slide |
Home | Go to first slide |
End | Go to last slide |
Number + Return | Go to specific slide |
b / m / f | Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode |
c | Clone slideshow |
p | Toggle presenter mode |
t | Restart the presentation timer |
?, h | Toggle this help |
o | Tile View: Overview of Slides |
Esc | Back to slideshow |
Firm is a mere production process:
Synonymous with production function
Fully replicable
We'll explore (and explode) this much later
We'll assume “the firm” is the agent to model:
So what do firms do?
How would we set up an optimization model:
Choose: < some alternative >
In order to maximize: < some objective >
Subject to: < some constraints >
Firms convert some goods to other goods:
Inputs: x1,x2,⋯,xn
Firms convert some goods to other goods:
Inputs: x1,x2,⋯,xn
Output: q
The production function
The production algorithm
q=Af(t,l,k)
Factor | Owned By | Earns |
---|---|---|
Land (t) | Landowners | Rent |
Labor (l) | Laborers | Wages |
Capital (k) | Capitalists | Interest |
q=f(l,k)
Factor | Owned By | Earns |
---|---|---|
Labor (l) | Laborers | Wages |
Capital (k) | Capitalists | Interest |
We assume firms maximize profit (π)
Not true for all firms
Even profit-seeking firms may also want to maximize additional things
In economics, profit is simply benefits minus (opportunity) costs
Suppose firm sells output q at price p
In economics, profit is simply benefits minus (opportunity) costs
Suppose firm sells output q at price p
It can buy each input xi at an associated price pi, i.e.
In economics, profit is simply benefits minus (opportunity) costs
Suppose firm sells output q at price p
It can buy each input xi at an associated price pi, i.e.
The profit of selling q units and using inputs l,k is:
π=pqrevenues−(wl+rk)costs
π=pqrevenues−(wl+rk)costs
π=pqrevenues−(wl+rk)costs
Profits are the residual value leftover after paying all factors
Profits are income for the residual claimant(s) of the production process (i.e. owner(s) of a firm):
π=pqrevenues−(wl+rk)costs
Residual claimants have incentives to maximize firm's profits, as this maximizes their own income
Entrepreneurs and shareholders are the only participants in production that are not guaranteed an income!
In markets, production must face the profit test:
Profits are an indication that value is being created for society
Losses are an indication that value is being destroyed for society
Survival in markets requires firms continually create value & earn profits
Choose: < some alternative >
In order to maximize: < profits >
Subject to: < technology >
What do firms choose? (Not an easy answer)
Prices?
Essential question: how competitive is a market? This will influence what firms (can) do
The marginal product of an input is the additional output produced by one more unit of that input (holding all other inputs constant)
Like marginal utility
Similar to marginal utilities, I will give you the marginal product equations
Marginal product of labor (MPl): additional output produced by adding one more unit of labor (holding k constant) MPl=ΔqΔl
MPl is slope of TP at each value of l!
Marginal product of capital (MPk): additional output produced by adding one more unit of capital (holding l constant) MPk=ΔqΔk
MPk is slope of TP at each value of k!
Note we don't consider capital in the short run!
Law of Diminishing Returns: adding more of one factor of production holding all others constant will result in successively lower increases in output
In order to increase output, firm will need to increase all factors!
Law of Diminishing Returns: adding more of one factor of production holding all others constant will result in successively lower increases in output
In order to increase output, firm will need to increase all factors!
Average product of labor (APl): total output per worker APl=ql
A measure of labor productivity
Average product of capital (APk): total output per unit of capital APk=qk
q=f(k,l)
Can build more factories, open more storefronts, rent more space, invest in machines, etc.
So the firm can choose both l and k
This leads to the difference between:
A really difficult concept to think about!
Supply is actually Demand in disguise!
An (opportunity) cost to buy (scarce) inputs for production because other people demand those same inputs to consume or produce other valuable things!
Because resources are scarce, and have rivalrous uses, how do we know we are using resources efficiently??
In functioning markets, the market price measures the opportunity cost of using a resource for an alternative use
Firms not only pay for direct use of a resource, but also indirectly compensate society for “pulling the resource out” of alternate uses in the economy!
Examples:
Opportunity cost is a forward-looking concept
Choices made in the past with non-recoverable costs are called sunk costs
Sunk costs should not enter into future decisions
Many people have difficulty letting go of unchangeable past decisions: sunk cost fallacy
Licensing fees, long-term lease contracts
Specific capital (with no alternative use): uniforms, menus, signs
Research & Development spending
Advertising spending
“Accounting point of view”: are you taking in more cash than you are spending?
“Economic point of view”: is your product you making the best social use of your resources
Implications for society: are consumers best off with you using scarce resources (with alternative uses!) to produce your current product?
Remember: this is an economics course, not a business course!
C(q)=f+VC(q)
C(q)=f+VC(q)
1. Fixed costs, f are costs that do not vary with output
C(q)=f+VC(q)
1. Fixed costs, f are costs that do not vary with output
2. Variable costs, VC(q) are costs that vary with output (notice the variable in them!)
† Assuming that (i) firms are always choosing input combinations that minimize total cost and (ii) input prices are constant. See more in today’s appendix.
Example: Airlines
Fixed costs: the aircraft, regulatory approval
Variable costs: providing one more flight
Example: Car Factory
Fixed costs: the factory, machines in the factory
Variable costs: producing one more car
Example: Starbucks
Fixed costs: the retail space, espresso machines
Variable costs: selling one more cup of coffee
Diff. between fixed vs. sunk costs?
Sunk costs are a type of fixed cost that are not avoidable or recoverable
Many fixed costs can be avoided or changed in the long run
Common fixed, but not sunk, costs:
When deciding to stay in business, fixed costs matter, sunk costs do not!
q | f | VC(q) | C(q) |
---|---|---|---|
0 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
1 | 10 | 2 | 12 |
2 | 10 | 6 | 16 |
3 | 10 | 12 | 22 |
4 | 10 | 20 | 30 |
5 | 10 | 30 | 40 |
6 | 10 | 42 | 52 |
7 | 10 | 56 | 66 |
8 | 10 | 72 | 82 |
9 | 10 | 90 | 100 |
10 | 10 | 110 | 120 |
AFC(q)=fq
AFC(q)=fq
AVC(q)=VC(q)q
AFC(q)=fq
AVC(q)=VC(q)q
AC(q)=C(q)q
MC(q)=ΔC(q)Δq
Calculus: first derivative of the cost function
Marginal cost is the primary cost that matters in making decisions
Mathematical relationship between a marginal & an average value
If marginal < average, then average ↓
Mathematical relationship between a marginal & an average value
If marginal < average, then average ↓
If marginal > average, then average ↑
Mathematical relationship between a marginal & an average value
If marginal < average, then average ↓
If marginal > average, then average ↑
When marginal = average, average is maximized/minimized
Mathematical relationship between a marginal & an average value
If marginal < average, then average ↓
If marginal > average, then average ↑
When marginal = average, average is maximized/minimized
Long run: firm can change all factors of production & vary scale of production
Long run average cost, LRAC(q): cost per unit of output when the firm can change both l and k to make more q
Long run marginal cost, LRMC(q): change in long run total cost as the firm produce an additional unit of q (by changing both l and/or k)
Long run: firm can choose k (factories, locations, etc)
Separate short run average cost (SRAC) curves for each amount of k potentially chosen
Long run: firm can choose k (factories, locations, etc)
Separate short run average cost (SRAC) curves for each amount of k potentially chosen
Long run average cost (LRAC) curve “envelopes” the lowest (optimal) regions of all the SRAC curves!
“Subject to producing the optimal amount of output, choose l and k to minimize cost”
Further important properties about costs based on scale economies of production: change in average costs when output is increased (scaled)
Economies of scale: average costs fall with more output
Diseconomies of scale: average costs rise with more output
Constant economies of scale: average costs don’t change with more output
Minimum Efficient Scale: q with the lowest AC(q)
Economies of Scale: ↑q, ↓AC(q)
Minimum Efficient Scale: q with the lowest AC(q)
Economies of Scale: ↑q, ↓AC(q)
Diseconomies of Scale: ↑q, ↑AC(q)
S(q)=AC(q)MC(q)
We often assume single-product plants/firms, but in reality most firms/plants are multi-product
Economies of Scope: cost of producing multiple products (e.g. q1 and q2) in a single plant exceeds costs of producing a single product in each plant
C(q1,q2)<C(q1,0)+C(0,q2)
Demand for a firm’s product is perfectly elastic at the market price
Where did the supply curve come from? You’ll know today
Average Revenue: revenue per unit of output AR(q)=Rq
Marginal Revenue: change in revenues for each additional unit of output sold: MR(q)=ΔR(q)Δq
Example: A firm sells bushels of wheat in a very competitive market. The current market price is $10/bushel.
Example: A firm sells bushels of wheat in a very competitive market. The current market price is $10/bushel.
For the 1st bushel sold:
What is the total revenue?
What is the average revenue?
Example: A firm sells bushels of wheat in a very competitive market. The current market price is $10/bushel.
For the 1st bushel sold:
What is the total revenue?
What is the average revenue?
For the 2nd bushel sold:
What is the total revenue?
What is the average revenue?
What is the marginal revenue?
q | R(q) |
---|---|
0 | 0 |
1 | 10 |
2 | 20 |
3 | 30 |
4 | 40 |
5 | 50 |
6 | 60 |
7 | 70 |
8 | 80 |
9 | 90 |
10 | 100 |
q | R(q) | AR(q) | MR(q) |
---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | − | − |
1 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
2 | 20 | 10 | 10 |
3 | 30 | 10 | 10 |
4 | 40 | 10 | 10 |
5 | 50 | 10 | 10 |
6 | 60 | 10 | 10 |
7 | 70 | 10 | 10 |
8 | 80 | 10 | 10 |
9 | 90 | 10 | 10 |
10 | 100 | 10 | 10 |