AC(q)min at a market price of $6
At any market price below $6.00, firm earns losses
At any market price above $6.00, firm earns “supernormal” profits (>0)
Short run: firms that shut down (q∗=0) stuck in market, incur fixed costs π=−f
Long run: firms earning losses (π<0) can exit the market and earn π=0
Short run: firms that shut down (q∗=0) stuck in market, incur fixed costs π=−f
Long run: firms earning losses (π<0) can exit the market and earn π=0
Entrepreneurs not currently in market can enter and produce, if entry would earn them π>0
When p<AVC
Profits are negative
Short run: shut down production
Long run: firms in industry exit the industry
When AVC<p<AC
Profits are negative
Short run: continue production
Long run: firms in industry exit the industry
When AC<p
Profits are positive
Short run: continue production
Long run: firms in industry stay in industry
1. Choose q∗ such that MR(q)=MC(q)
2. Profit π=q[p−AC(q)]
3. Shut down in short run if p<AVC(q) AVC(q)min=MC(q)
Firm’s short run supply curve:
4. Exit in long run if \\(p<AC(q)\\)
ACmin(q)=MC(q)
Firm’s long run supply curve:
Now we must combine optimizing individual firms with market-wide adjustment to equilibrium
Since π=[p−AC(q)]q, in the long run, profit-seeking firms will:
Now we must combine optimizing individual firms with market-wide adjustment to equilibrium
Since π=[p−AC(q)]q, in the long run, profit-seeking firms will:
Now we must combine optimizing individual firms with market-wide adjustment to equilibrium
Since π=[p−AC(q)]q, in the long run, profit-seeking firms will:
Long-run equilibrium: entry and exit ceases when p=AC(q) for all firms, implying normal economic profits of π=0
Long run economic profits for all firms in a competitive industry are 0
Firms must earn an accounting profit to stay in business
Industry supply curve: horizontal sum of all individual firms' supply curves
To keep it simple on the following slides:
Short Run: each firm is earning profits p>AC(q)
Long run: induces entry by firm 3, firm 4, ⋯, firm n
Short Run: each firm is earning profits p>AC(q)
Long run: induces entry by firm 3, firm 4, ⋯, firm n
Short Run: each firm is earning profits p>AC(q)
Long run: induces entry by firm 3, firm 4, ⋯, firm n
Long run industry equilibrium: p=AC(q)min, π=0 at p= $6; supply becomes more elastic
q=f(L,K)
Zero long run economic profit ≠ industry disappears, just stops growing
Less attractive to entrepreneurs & start ups to enter than other, more profitable industries
These are mature industries (again, often commodities), the backbone of the economy, just not sexy!
All factors are paid their market price
Firms earn normal market rate of return
But we've so far been imagining a market where every firm is identical, just a recipe “any idiot” can copy
What about if firms have different technologies or costs?
Firms have different technologies/costs due to relative differences in:
Let's derive industry supply curve again, and see how this may affect profits
Long-run equilibrium p=AC(q)min of the marginal (highest-cost) firm
The marginal firm earns normal economic profit (of zero)
Generalized, No-Profitable Entry Condition: in equilibrium, no firm can earn positive profits by entering the industry
“Inframarginal” (lower-cost) firms are using resources that earn economic rents
Economic rents arise from relative differences between resources
Economic rent: a return or payment for a resource above its normal market return (opportunity cost)
Has no allocative effect on resources, entirely “inframarginal”
A windfall return that resource owners get for free
Inframarginal firms that employ these scarce factors gain a short-run profits from having lower costs/higher productivity
...But what will happen to the prices for their scarce factors over time?
In a competitive market, over the long run, profits are dissipated through competition
Competition over acquiring the scarce factors pushes up their prices
Rents are included in the opportunity cost (price) for inputs over long run
From the firm’s perspective, over the long-run, rents are included in the price (opportunity cost) of the scarce factor
Firm does not earn the rents, they raise firm's costs and squeeze profits to zero!
Short Run: firm that possesses scarce rent-generating factors has lower costs, perhaps short-run profits
Long run: competition over those factors pushes up their prices, raising costs to firm, until its profits go to zero as well
Owners of scarce factors (workers, landowners, inventors, etc) earn the rents as higher income for their services (wages, land rent, interest, royalties, etc).
Often induces competition to supply alternative factors, which may dissipate the rents (to zero)
Recall “economic point of view”:
Producing your product pulls scarce resources out of other productive uses in the economy
Profits attract resources: pulled out of other (less valuable) uses
Losses repel resources: pulled away to other (more valuable) uses
Zero profits keep resources where they are
Example: Daniel’s Midland Archers has the following cost structure for producing archery bows:
C(q)=2q2+3q+50MC(q)=4q+3
Suppose the market is very competitive and the current market price is $15.
How many bows should the firm produce?
How much profit will it earn per day?
At what price would the firm break even?
At what price should the firm shut down in the short run?
Write equations for firm’s short-run supply curve and long-run supply curve.
Demand function measures how much you would hypothetically be willing to pay for various quantities
You often actually pay (the market-clearing price, p∗) a lot less than your reservation price
The difference is consumer surplus
CS=WTP−p∗
CS=12bhCS=12(5−0)($10−$5)CS=$12.50
Supply function measures how much you would hypothetically be willing to accept to sell various quantities
You often actually receive (the market-clearing price, p∗) a lot more than your reservation price
The difference is producer surplus
PS=p∗−WTA
Allocative efficiency: resources are allocated to highest-valued uses
All potential gains from trade are fully exhausted
Economic surplus = Consumer surplus + Producer surplus
Maximized in competitive equilibrium
Resources flow away from those who value them the lowest to those that value them the highest
The social value of resources is maximized by allocating them to their highest valued uses!
Keyboard shortcuts
↑, ←, Pg Up, k | Go to previous slide |
↓, →, Pg Dn, Space, j | Go to next slide |
Home | Go to first slide |
End | Go to last slide |
Number + Return | Go to specific slide |
b / m / f | Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode |
c | Clone slideshow |
p | Toggle presenter mode |
t | Restart the presentation timer |
?, h | Toggle this help |
o | Tile View: Overview of Slides |
Esc | Back to slideshow |
AC(q)min at a market price of $6
At any market price below $6.00, firm earns losses
At any market price above $6.00, firm earns “supernormal” profits (>0)
Short run: firms that shut down (q∗=0) stuck in market, incur fixed costs π=−f
Long run: firms earning losses (π<0) can exit the market and earn π=0
Short run: firms that shut down (q∗=0) stuck in market, incur fixed costs π=−f
Long run: firms earning losses (π<0) can exit the market and earn π=0
Entrepreneurs not currently in market can enter and produce, if entry would earn them π>0
When p<AVC
Profits are negative
Short run: shut down production
Long run: firms in industry exit the industry
When AVC<p<AC
Profits are negative
Short run: continue production
Long run: firms in industry exit the industry
When AC<p
Profits are positive
Short run: continue production
Long run: firms in industry stay in industry
1. Choose q∗ such that MR(q)=MC(q)
2. Profit π=q[p−AC(q)]
3. Shut down in short run if p<AVC(q) AVC(q)min=MC(q)
Firm’s short run supply curve:
4. Exit in long run if \\(p<AC(q)\\)
ACmin(q)=MC(q)
Firm’s long run supply curve:
Now we must combine optimizing individual firms with market-wide adjustment to equilibrium
Since π=[p−AC(q)]q, in the long run, profit-seeking firms will:
Now we must combine optimizing individual firms with market-wide adjustment to equilibrium
Since π=[p−AC(q)]q, in the long run, profit-seeking firms will:
Now we must combine optimizing individual firms with market-wide adjustment to equilibrium
Since π=[p−AC(q)]q, in the long run, profit-seeking firms will:
Long-run equilibrium: entry and exit ceases when p=AC(q) for all firms, implying normal economic profits of π=0
Long run economic profits for all firms in a competitive industry are 0
Firms must earn an accounting profit to stay in business
Industry supply curve: horizontal sum of all individual firms' supply curves
To keep it simple on the following slides:
Short Run: each firm is earning profits p>AC(q)
Long run: induces entry by firm 3, firm 4, ⋯, firm n
Short Run: each firm is earning profits p>AC(q)
Long run: induces entry by firm 3, firm 4, ⋯, firm n
Short Run: each firm is earning profits p>AC(q)
Long run: induces entry by firm 3, firm 4, ⋯, firm n
Long run industry equilibrium: p=AC(q)min, π=0 at p= $6; supply becomes more elastic
q=f(L,K)
Zero long run economic profit ≠ industry disappears, just stops growing
Less attractive to entrepreneurs & start ups to enter than other, more profitable industries
These are mature industries (again, often commodities), the backbone of the economy, just not sexy!
All factors are paid their market price
Firms earn normal market rate of return
But we've so far been imagining a market where every firm is identical, just a recipe “any idiot” can copy
What about if firms have different technologies or costs?
Firms have different technologies/costs due to relative differences in:
Let's derive industry supply curve again, and see how this may affect profits
Long-run equilibrium p=AC(q)min of the marginal (highest-cost) firm
The marginal firm earns normal economic profit (of zero)
Generalized, No-Profitable Entry Condition: in equilibrium, no firm can earn positive profits by entering the industry
“Inframarginal” (lower-cost) firms are using resources that earn economic rents
Economic rents arise from relative differences between resources
Economic rent: a return or payment for a resource above its normal market return (opportunity cost)
Has no allocative effect on resources, entirely “inframarginal”
A windfall return that resource owners get for free
Inframarginal firms that employ these scarce factors gain a short-run profits from having lower costs/higher productivity
...But what will happen to the prices for their scarce factors over time?
In a competitive market, over the long run, profits are dissipated through competition
Competition over acquiring the scarce factors pushes up their prices
Rents are included in the opportunity cost (price) for inputs over long run
From the firm’s perspective, over the long-run, rents are included in the price (opportunity cost) of the scarce factor
Firm does not earn the rents, they raise firm's costs and squeeze profits to zero!
Short Run: firm that possesses scarce rent-generating factors has lower costs, perhaps short-run profits
Long run: competition over those factors pushes up their prices, raising costs to firm, until its profits go to zero as well
Owners of scarce factors (workers, landowners, inventors, etc) earn the rents as higher income for their services (wages, land rent, interest, royalties, etc).
Often induces competition to supply alternative factors, which may dissipate the rents (to zero)
Recall “economic point of view”:
Producing your product pulls scarce resources out of other productive uses in the economy
Profits attract resources: pulled out of other (less valuable) uses
Losses repel resources: pulled away to other (more valuable) uses
Zero profits keep resources where they are
Example: Daniel’s Midland Archers has the following cost structure for producing archery bows:
C(q)=2q2+3q+50MC(q)=4q+3
Suppose the market is very competitive and the current market price is $15.
How many bows should the firm produce?
How much profit will it earn per day?
At what price would the firm break even?
At what price should the firm shut down in the short run?
Write equations for firm’s short-run supply curve and long-run supply curve.
Demand function measures how much you would hypothetically be willing to pay for various quantities
You often actually pay (the market-clearing price, p∗) a lot less than your reservation price
The difference is consumer surplus
CS=WTP−p∗
CS=12bhCS=12(5−0)($10−$5)CS=$12.50
Supply function measures how much you would hypothetically be willing to accept to sell various quantities
You often actually receive (the market-clearing price, p∗) a lot more than your reservation price
The difference is producer surplus
PS=p∗−WTA
Allocative efficiency: resources are allocated to highest-valued uses
All potential gains from trade are fully exhausted
Economic surplus = Consumer surplus + Producer surplus
Maximized in competitive equilibrium
Resources flow away from those who value them the lowest to those that value them the highest
The social value of resources is maximized by allocating them to their highest valued uses!